Desktop vs mobile — the two families
Desktop computer — designed to stay in one location, built from separate units (system unit/tower, monitor, keyboard, mouse) that connect together and run from mains power. Mobile computer — designed to be carried around and used in different locations, powered by an internal rechargeable battery, with its parts combined into a single portable case. The syllabus names four mobile types: laptop, tablet, smartphone, phablet.
The four distinguishing characteristics
Portability — a desktop is fixed in one place; a mobile computer is carried and used on the move. Power source — continuous mains power versus an internal rechargeable battery, limited between charges. Input method — a separate physical keyboard and mouse versus a touchscreen, though a laptop keeps a built-in keyboard. Expandability — a desktop's case opens so RAM, storage or a graphics card can be upgraded; a mobile device is a sealed, integrated unit.
The device types and the uses they suit
Laptop — full physical keyboard, hinged screen, desktop operating system. Tablet — touchscreen only, no physical keyboard, lighter and thinner. Smartphone — pocket-sized touchscreen that also makes calls. Phablet — a smartphone/tablet hybrid, larger than a phone, smaller than a tablet. Uses: desktop for office work and high-spec gaming; laptop for business travel; tablet for education and entertainment; smartphone for casual gaming and remote control.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Describing one device is not comparing
On a compare or advantage/disadvantage question, many answers describe only ONE device and never relate it to the other, which earns nothing. "The laptop has a large screen" is a bare statement and fails; "the desktop has a larger screen than the laptop" makes the comparison explicit and scores. The comparative word is what turns a description into a comparison.
Flagged w23 P11 Q3a — "The laptop has a large screen" fails; "a larger screen" is a comparison
A benefit is not an advantage
An advantage compares two things; a benefit only says something good about one. The examiners' own example: "good-quality printout" is a benefit and fails, while "better-quality than a dot-matrix" is an advantage and scores. Applied here, "the tablet is light" is a benefit; "the tablet is lighter than the laptop" is an advantage.
Cost and battery life are not accepted
Cost, battery life and storage capacity are all ruled too subjective on device and storage comparisons, because models vary and technology moves on — the later reports record that cost and battery are no longer credited at all. Never build a desktop-versus-mobile comparison on price or on how long the battery lasts, even if you attach a reason to it.
Flagged w22 P11 Q2c/Q12, s22 P12 Q3, s23 P13 Q3a — cost, battery life and storage capacity ruled too subjective on device compares
A use is not a characteristic
Asked for a characteristic that distinguishes a desktop from a mobile computer, candidates give a use instead — "it is for gaming", "it is used in offices". A characteristic is a property of the device itself: portability, power source, input method or expandability. Vague size claims such as "the desktop is bigger", with no further detail, fail for the same reason.
Expandability is not adding accessories
Expandability means the case can be opened so internal components — RAM, storage, a graphics card — are upgraded or replaced. Adding a protective case, a memory card or a plug-in peripheral is not expandability. Nor is "a smartphone is not expandable" enough on its own: give the reason, that it is built as a single sealed, integrated unit.
"Small computer" is not a device name
A general description instead of the technical device name causes vagueness and loses the mark. Name the type — laptop, tablet, smartphone, phablet or desktop computer — never "a small computer" or "a handheld". The phablet is the one most often forgotten: a smartphone/tablet hybrid, larger than a phone, smaller than a tablet, with features of both.
Flagged w23 P12 Q5 — phablet = smartphone/tablet hybrid; general rather than technical device names cause vagueness
Brand names and vague words score zero
Examiners give no credit for a manufacturer or product name, so use the generic term every time: tablet, laptop, smartphone, phablet, desktop computer. Vague wording fails the same way — "it is quicker" or "it covers a larger area" are too imprecise. The precise, comparative version scores, e.g. "more portable than the desktop because it fits in a bag".
Comparative, then "than", then "because"
Build every compare or advantage answer from three parts: a comparative word (more, less, larger, lighter), than the other device, and a reason opening with because. Leave any one of the three out and the point usually scores nothing.
Choose a feature that scores
Compare on portability, expandability, screen size, weight or input method. Cost, battery life and storage capacity are ruled too subjective, so a comparison built on those earns nothing however well it is written — pick a credited feature before you start writing.
Never split the answer into columns
Do not rule a vertical line down the page and list advantages one side, disadvantages the other. Splitting the answer that way prevents a true comparison and caps the marks. Write linked comparative points in continuous prose instead.
Answer the scenario, do not echo it
Name the specific device the scenario needs, then link one of its features directly to that need. Repeating words from the stem earns nothing, so say what the feature lets the user do rather than restating the task the question already described.
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.