Why the Provisional Government failed
After Nicholas II abdicated (March 1917), a Provisional Government (Lvov, then Kerensky from July) shared "dual power" with the Petrograd Soviet. It collapsed by October: it kept fighting the unpopular First World War (the failed June 1917 offensive), delayed land reform, and had no independent power base. Lenin's April Theses -- "Peace, Land, and Bread" -- exploited these failures, and the Kornilov Affair (August 1917) left the Bolshevik Red Guards armed and credible.
How the Bolsheviks consolidated power
In the seizure (24-25 October 1917), Red Guards under Trotsky's Military Revolutionary Committee took the Winter Palace. Consolidation mixed ruthless measures -- the Cheka, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (1918), and War Communism, which won the 1918-21 Civil War but caused the 1921 famine -- with a reversal: after the Kronstadt Rising (1921), the New Economic Policy restored limited private trade, an ideological retreat that revived the economy. Weigh victory against its cost.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Petrograd Soviet ≠ Bolshevik Party
Candidates confuse the Petrograd Soviet with the Bolshevik Party. The Soviet was a broad elected council of workers' and soldiers' deputies including Mensheviks and SRs; the Bolsheviks were a minority until September 1917. It weakened the government as a rival authority -- "Order Number 1" (March 1917) told soldiers to obey the Soviet -- with or without Bolshevik control.
Digest (## DC2): candidates confuse the Petrograd Soviet with the Bolshevik Party (Paper 4).
Straying outside the set date range
When a question is scoped (e.g. "abdication to November 1917"), weaker candidates stray into the earlier Tsarist period -- Bloody Sunday, the 1905 Revolution, Rasputin -- which earns no credit. The reverse also loses marks: a question on the October seizure should not narrate the Civil War, War Communism or NEP. Fix the stage the question sets and stay inside its dates.
Digest (## DC2 / General exam technique): keep strictly to the dates given; candidates include material outside the date range specified (Paper 4, Paper 1).
Seizure of power ≠ consolidation
Candidates blur the seizure of power with consolidation of rule. The seizure is the single event of 24-25 October 1917 -- the Winter Palace coup. Consolidation is everything after: Brest-Litovsk, the Cheka, the Civil War, War Communism, Kronstadt and the NEP. A "how did they seize power" question wants the coup, not years of later policy.
(general exam technique)
War Communism ≠ the NEP
These were opposite policies, easily muddled. War Communism (1918-21) meant state control of industry and forced grain requisitioning to win the Civil War, causing hardship and the 1921 famine. The NEP (from 1921) reversed this: a tax in kind replaced requisitioning and limited private trade was allowed. Reversing the two makes the Kronstadt-to-NEP chain incoherent.
Describing events, not explaining why
On "Explain why" questions, candidates describe what happened instead of why it mattered -- narrating the Kornilov Affair without linking it to the Bolsheviks gaining arms and credibility. Narrative "scene-setting" earns no credit. Every point should answer the "why", connecting the event to the outcome the question names.
Digest (## General exam technique): Part (b) -- many describe what happened instead of explaining why (Paper 1).
Arguing only one side in a how-far
In "How far do you agree" answers, weaker candidates argue one side then assert a verdict. A judgement must weigh evidence, not restate it. Develop BOTH sides -- for the NEP, its real economic recovery against its ideological retreat -- then explain which is stronger. A conclusion that repeats earlier points without weighing them stays in the lower bands.
Digest (## General exam technique): Part (c) answers often assert a verdict without weighing sides, or argue only one side (Paper 1, Paper 2).
October 1917 was a coup, not a mass rising
Students often think the October 1917 seizure was a mass popular uprising, like the February/March revolution that toppled the Tsar. In fact it was a small, organised coup: armed Red Guards under Trotsky's Military Revolutionary Committee took key buildings and the Winter Palace in one night, because the government had lost support and had almost no loyal troops left.
Weigh both sides, then judge
For "How far was the NEP a success?", develop both sides -- FOR: production recovered and "Nepmen" revived trade; AGAINST: an ideological retreat, temporary, later scrapped by Stalin. Then reach an explicit, weighed judgement.
Match the command word
Answer only what the command word asks. "Describe" (Part a) wants short facts, no explanation. "Explain why" (Part b) wants reasons, not narrative. "How far do you agree" (Part c) wants a two-sided, weighed judgement. Mismatching the command caps the mark.
Judging a source for usefulness
For a Paper 2 utility question, tie content AND provenance/purpose to what the source shows, then give an explicit verdict. Avoid "biased, therefore useless" -- a propaganda source is useful evidence of the view it promotes, not provenance recited alone.
Comparing two sources
When comparing two sources, work point-by-point, not summarising each in turn. Explain disagreements more fully than agreements, stating both sides explicitly. For the "how far do the sources support the hypothesis" question, ground every claim in a specific quotation.
This Key Question covers the period from the Tsar's abdication in March 1917 to the establishment of the New Economic Policy in 1921. It asks you to explain why the Provisional Government failed, how the Bolsheviks seized power in October/November 1917, and how they then consolidated their rule through the Civil War, War Communism, the Kronstadt Rising and the NEP.
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.