Why the wartime alliance broke down, 1945-46
Wartime allies, the USA and USSR were natural rivals — capitalist democracy versus one-party communism. At Yalta (Feb 1945) cooperation held: Stalin promised free elections in the liberated east. By Potsdam (Jul-Aug 1945) trust had gone — a suspicious Truman had replaced Roosevelt, the USA had tested the atomic bomb, and Stalin was installing communist governments in the east. Once the shared aim of beating Hitler was gone, the alliance broke down.
Cold War blame: the two-sided case
A "how far was [country] responsible?" answer must weigh both sides. Against the USSR: Stalin broke his Yalta free-elections promise, imposed one-party communist rule across Eastern Europe by 1948, and used the Berlin Blockade (1948-49) against the Allies. Against the USA: Truman adopted containment — the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan (both 1947) drew Western Europe into the US sphere. Judge whose move was the more provocative first.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Berlin Blockade ≠ Berlin Wall
The Berlin Blockade (June 1948-May 1949) was Stalin cutting land access to West Berlin; the Allies answered with the Berlin Airlift until he lifted it. The Berlin Wall, built by East Germany in August 1961, thirteen years later, stopped East Germans fleeing west — a separate crisis. Recall too that the Western Allies held West Berlin, the USSR the East.
Digest (## B4): candidates confuse the Berlin Blockade with the Berlin Wall, blending the two separate events, and sometimes muddle which powers held East/West Berlin (Paper 1).
Yalta (Feb 1945) came before Potsdam
Yalta (February 1945) came first — wartime, Roosevelt still alive, cooperation still workable. Potsdam (July-August 1945) followed Germany's surrender: Roosevelt had died, Truman was president, the atomic bomb was tested, and relations were strained over reparations and Poland's borders. Do not swap the two conferences.
Digest (## B4): Potsdam agreements confused with Yalta agreements (Paper 1).
Truman Doctrine ≠ Marshall Plan
Both are 1947 US responses to communism. The Truman Doctrine was the pledge to aid any country resisting a communist takeover — the statement of containment. The Marshall Plan was the economic programme that followed, offering US money to rebuild Western Europe against communism. One is the principle, the other the programme; do not use one name for the other.
Digest (## General exam technique): confusing similarly-named events/organisations/treaties/personnel is a recurring error across topics (Paper 1).
Explain why an event raised tension
"Why" and "how far" questions credit explanation, not narrative. Describing the Berlin Blockade (routes cut, supplies flown in) earns little unless you explain why it raised tension: it showed each superpower would risk direct confrontation over Germany and hardened the split of Europe into two blocs. Turn the event into a reason, not a retelling.
Digest (## B4): weaker answers describe the Blockade without explaining why it caused tension (Paper 1).
Poland flashpoint needs two reasons
On Poland as a Cold War flashpoint, examiners want two developed, evidenced reasons, not one generic point: (1) the Soviet desire for a friendly buffer state against future invasion from the west, and (2) the absence of genuinely free elections despite Stalin's Yalta promise. Give each its own supporting detail.
Digest (## B4): on Poland as a flashpoint, two developed evidenced explanations are needed rather than one-sided/generic answers (Paper 1).
One-sided "who was to blame" judgements
A 10-mark "how far" or "who was more to blame" answer must weigh both sides. Weaker answers argue only one side, or assert a share of blame ("the USA was 60 per cent responsible") without comparing evidence. The best answers set Truman's policies (Marshall Plan, Truman Doctrine, atomic bomb) against Soviet actions in Eastern Europe and reach a judgement.
Digest (## General exam technique / ## B4): Part (c) conclusions assert "how far X is true" without explaining which side is stronger; on "how far was Truman responsible" the best answers weigh Truman's policies against Soviet actions (Paper 1).
Warsaw Pact was not an instant reply to NATO
A common wrong belief. NATO (1949) was the Western defensive alliance against the USSR. The Warsaw Pact came only in 1955 — six years later, prompted by West Germany joining NATO that year. Do not confuse Cominform (1947, communist parties) with Comecon (1949, Soviet economics) — different purposes and dates, and neither is the Warsaw Pact.
Digest (## B4): Cominform and Comecon confused on purpose/start dates; some wrongly assume the Warsaw Pact was an immediate 1949 reaction to NATO's formation (Paper 1).
Three-stage "who was to blame" essay
Build it in three stages: (1) the case against the USSR — broken Yalta promises, one-party rule by 1948, the Berlin Blockade; (2) the case against the USA — Truman Doctrine, Marshall Plan, atomic bomb; (3) a judgement on which side mattered more, not just "both share blame".
Match the Paper 1 command word
Read the command word. Part (a) "describe" wants short, accurate facts — no background, no "scene-setting" intro. Part (b) "explain why" wants reasons, not a retelling. Part (c) "how far do you agree" wants both sides plus a judgement. Answering the wrong command loses marks.
Stay inside the dates in the question
Cold War questions are tightly dated. Material outside the stated range dilutes relevance — for example bringing the Berlin Wall (1961) or Warsaw Pact (1955) into a question on the 1945-49 origins. Check the cut-off date named in the question and do not drift beyond it.
Source utility: bias does not mean useless
On Paper 2 usefulness questions, do not dismiss a source as "biased therefore useless". A one-sided source is still useful evidence of the viewpoint it represents. Tie your verdict to the source's content and purpose, and say what a historian could and could not learn from it.
The Cold War was the state of hostility and rivalry between the USA and the USSR (and their allies) that developed after the Second World War, without the two superpowers ever fighting each other directly. Its origins lie in 1945-48, as the wartime alliance against Hitler broke down and each side came to see the other as a threat.
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.