The Big Three's clashing aims
Drawn up at the Paris Peace Conference (1919) by the Big Three, whose aims clashed. Clemenceau (France) wanted revenge and security: punish and disarm Germany, make it pay, regain Alsace-Lorraine. Wilson (USA) wanted a fair, lasting peace on his Fourteen Points — above all self-determination and a League of Nations. Lloyd George (Britain) wanted a middle course: weaken Germany yet keep it able to trade and resist communism. So the Treaty satisfied none fully.
Was it fair? Argue both sides
Argue both sides. Justified at the time: Germany had imposed the harsh Brest-Litovsk treaty on Russia (1918); France needed security after two invasions; and war damage had to be paid for. Unfair / a diktat: Germany signed without negotiation; Article 231 blamed it alone; reparations damaged the economy; self-determination was denied to Germans (no Anschluss, Germans under Polish rule); and army limits (100,000 men) left it defenceless. Weigh these, don't restate.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Versailles was with Germany, not Sevres
Versailles was the treaty with Germany. Other defeated powers had their own treaties — Sevres with Turkey, a settlement with Hungary. Candidates wrongly transplant German grievances (reparations, war guilt) onto Sevres, where they did not apply, and stray onto Ataturk and the Treaty of Lausanne. Match each grievance to the treaty that carried it.
Digest (## B1): candidates transplant German grievances onto the Treaty of Sevres and confuse Sevres with the treaties on Germany or Hungary; Ataturk and Lausanne are irrelevant to Sevres (Paper 1).
Explain the impact, don't list the terms
"Why" questions credit explanation of impact, not a list of clauses. Weaker answers state that the army was cut to 100,000, the Rhineland demilitarised or colonies lost without saying why this mattered — that disarmament left Germans defenceless while others kept their arms, or that lost industrial land weakened the economy. Turn each term into its consequence.
Digest (## B1): weaker answers describe territorial/military terms without explaining their consequences (Paper 1, Paper 2).
Define self-determination precisely
Candidates name "self-determination" but often cannot define it precisely: the right of a people to choose their own government. Vague answers about "strength of resolve" earn little. Note the contradiction that it was granted to the defeated empires but denied to Germans — Anschluss with Austria was forbidden and Germans were placed under Polish rule.
Digest (## B1): candidates can name the Fourteen Points and self-determination but cannot define it precisely, giving vague "strength of resolve" answers (Paper 1).
War guilt: go beyond "not our fault alone"
On bitterness over the War Guilt Clause (Article 231), many state only that Germans felt not wholly responsible, without deeper explanation. A stronger answer explains why — that Russian mobilisation and Austria-Hungary's stance toward Serbia had helped cause the war — and that the real grievance was being blamed alone and made liable for reparations.
Digest (## B1): on German bitterness over war guilt, many state only that Germans felt not wholly responsible, without deeper explanation such as Russian mobilisation or Austria-Hungary's stance toward Serbia (Paper 1).
Explain WHY the Big Three differed
On why the Big Three wanted different things, weaker answers describe what each wanted rather than the underlying reasons. Develop the causes: Clemenceau's security fears after France was invaded twice, Wilson's idealism and Fourteen Points, and Lloyd George's concern for British trade and fear of Bolshevism. The reason behind each aim earns the marks.
Digest (## B1): on why the Big Three wanted different things, weaker answers describe what each wanted rather than the underlying reasons — Clemenceau's security fears, Wilson's idealism, Lloyd George's trade and fear of Bolshevism (Paper 1).
Show the reparations-hyperinflation chain
The link from reparations to the 1923 hyperinflation is often too vague to count as explanation. Set out the chain: reparations strained the economy; when Germany fell behind, French and Belgian troops occupied the Ruhr in January 1923; passive resistance and printing money to pay strikers triggered hyperinflation, wiping out savings. Each step must connect to the next.
Digest (## B1): the reparations-to-hyperinflation causal chain is often stated too vaguely to count as explanation (Paper 1).
Germany did not lose the Sudetenland in 1919
Germany did not lose the Sudetenland in 1919. It was a German-speaking border region of the new state of Czechoslovakia, not German territory Versailles transferred. It became a crisis only in 1938, when the Munich Agreement handed it to Hitler — outside the B1 range. The 1919 losses were Alsace-Lorraine, the Polish Corridor, Eupen-Malmedy, North Schleswig and the colonies.
Digest (## B1): some wrongly believe Germany lost the Sudetenland as part of the 1919 settlement (Paper 1).
Source utility: content, provenance, purpose
Do not stop at surface features or conclude "biased, therefore useless". Judge usefulness by content, provenance and purpose. A furious 1919 German editorial is strong evidence of opinion, useful because it is one-sided. State your verdict directly, tied to the content.
Part (b): explain WHY, not what happened
In a Part (b) "Explain why" answer, many describe what happened, not why, and "scene-setting" introductions earn no credit. Make each paragraph a developed reason that answers the "why" — e.g. why a term caused German anger — not a retelling of the Treaty.
Part (c): weigh both sides to a judgement
A Part (c) "How far do you agree" answer must develop both sides, then reach a judgement explaining which side is stronger — not one that asserts "how far" or restates earlier points. Plan two developed sides and a conclusion that decides between them.
Stay within the question's dates and country
Keep strictly to what the question specifies. On a Versailles question, do not drift onto the Treaty of Sevres, Turkey or Ataturk, and do not carry the story past the end of 1923 (the B1 range). Material outside the settlement or date range earns nothing, however accurate.
The Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919) was the peace settlement imposed on Germany after the First World War. It was drawn up at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 by the victorious Allies, led by the Big Three. Germany was not allowed to negotiate and had to accept the terms or face renewed war — this is why Germans called it a diktat (a dictated peace).
| Leader | Country | Main aims |
|---|
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.