Paper 4: Q1 gap-fill, Q2 email, Q3 /28 piece
Paper 4 (components 41/42/43) has three stages. Q1 is a five-item vocabulary gap-fill. Q2 is a bullet-point short message/email of ~80-100 words, usually present + future, marked on coverage, relevance, meaning and connectors. Q3 offers a choice of TWO longer pieces (article, letter, blog or report) of ~120-150 words, typically past + present + future/conditional across five bullets, marked out of 28: Task Completion (10), Range (10), Accuracy (8).
Q3: Completion, Range, Accuracy score apart
The Q3 mark scheme rewards three things independently. Task Completion — address every bullet in the tense it signals ("last year" = past; "next year" = future/modal). Range — vary structure and tenses (present, past, future/conditional) and use more than weil/und, including a subordinating conjunction (dass, obwohl, wenn, denn) sent verb-final. Accuracy — verb forms, case agreement, adjective endings, word order, noun capitals. You can lose one strand while acing the others.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
wann vs wenn, dass vs das
Precise spelling is marked, not cosmetic: wann ("when?") is routinely written for wenn ("when/if"), and dass (conjunction "that") for das (article) — across three sittings. Mann is also written for man, Küche ("kitchen") for Kuchen ("cake"), though both correct forms were often printed in the rubric.
s22 P42, s23 P42/43, w23 P42
Wrong tense caps the Task Completion mark
The digest names this the single most repeated Task Completion fault, named every sitting: answer every bullet in the tense it signals. What you DID needs a past tense; what you WILL do needs a future, modal or conditional. Wrong-tense German still loses that bullet's mark. Fix: underline the tense word (letztes Jahr, nächstes Jahr, normalerweise) first.
Named every sitting (s22, w22, s23, w23), components 42/43
Short clauses joined only by weil/und
The digest names a Range ceiling: many candidates "opted for short clauses and used a small number of conjunctions, usually weil or und". The Range mark then stalls in its middle band. To move up: varied sentence length; conjunctions beyond weil (dass, denn, wenn, obwohl); relative pronouns; and V2 inversion after a fronted element (am Wochenende werde ich...).
Range strand (s22 P43, w23 P42)
haben for sein in the Perfekt (motion verbs)
The digest names the wrong perfect auxiliary the single most-repeated Accuracy fault, with movement verbs: "the perfect tense of fahren was often conjugated with haben" (s23; also w22). Trap: Ich habe nach Hause gefahren (WRONG) vs Ich bin nach Hause gefahren (CORRECT) — motion and change-of-state verbs (fahren, gehen, kommen, fliegen) take sein, not haben.
w22 P42 Q3(b); s23 P42 Accuracy
Malformed participles: gegeht, gebakt
Past-participle FORMATION of well-rehearsed verbs is repeatedly flagged: basic verbs like spielen, gehen, fahren are often mis-formed, and non-standard forms gebakt (for gebacken) and gegeht (for gegangen) are named in both November sittings. Use the correct form: gegangen not gegeht, gefahren not gefahrt, gebacken not gebakt.
w22 P42, w23 P42 Accuracy
möchte vs mochte, würde vs wurde
Conditional confusion is named across sittings: the imperfect ich mochte ("liked") is written for the conditional ich möchte ("would like") (s22 Q2, s23 Q2); the report also names "wurde instead of würde and mochte for möchte" (s23). möchte/würde are Konjunktiv II; mochte/wurde are Präteritum ("liked"/"became"). The umlaut changes both meaning and tense.
s22 P42 Q2; s23 P42 Q2 and Accuracy
von + dative, not an apostrophe-s
Candidates transfer the English apostrophe-possessive into German instead of von + dative, named in two sittings' Accuracy sections: write das Zimmer von meiner Schwester ("my sister's room"), never meiner Schwester's Zimmer. von is dative, so the following possessive takes dative endings (von meinem Bruder).
w22 P42, w23 P42 Accuracy
lieber is an adverb, not a verb
The digest names lieber misused as a verb the most repeated Writing confusion: ich lieber Filme als Bücher instead of ich sehe lieber.... lieber is an adverb ("rather"), not a verb — it modifies a conjugated verb (ich fahre lieber mit dem Zug). Treating it as a standalone verb omits the verb the sentence needs, even when the preference vocabulary was right.
s23 P43(b); w23 P43(a)/(b)
Underline each bullet's tense signal first
Choose the task whose bullets you can say most about, then underline each bullet's tense signal: letztes Jahr signals Perfekt/Präteritum; nächstes Jahr signals Futur or Konjunktiv II; normalerweise signals Präsens. This one step prevents the tense-mismatch cap.
Plan two ideas per bullet
One sentence per bullet rarely earns full marks — add a second detail (a reason or contrast). Work through the bullets in sequence so none is dropped: each sitting a minority answer fewer than the full set, capping Task Completion.
Spread connectives and tenses on purpose
Vary structure for the Range mark: use weil at most once, add one of dass/obwohl/wenn/denn, and write one sentence fronting an adverbial with inversion (Nächstes Jahr fahre ich...). Aim for a Präsens, a Perfekt/Präteritum and a Futur or Konjunktiv II sentence.
Proofread the Accuracy checklist last
Proofread for Accuracy separately — it is a distinct scored strand: verb endings matching the subject, case after each preposition, adjective endings, word order, every noun capitalised. This pass catches the haben/sein and möchte/mochte slips that cost easy marks.
Paper 4 Writing (components 41, 42 or 43) moves from a short gap-fill (Q1), to a bullet-point short message/email of around 80-100 words (Q2), to a choice of two longer pieces of around 120-150 words (Q3) — an article, letter, blog post or report. Q2 is marked on task coverage and communication; Q3 is marked out of 28 across Task Completion (10), Range (10) and Accuracy (8).
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.