Six question groups; match on the synonym
Paper 2 (21/22/23) has six question groups: Q1 picture-match, Q2 notice-match, Q3 three-option MCQ, Q4 open comprehension (transformed), Q5 a 5-into-8 requirement-match, Q6 gist-and-detail short-answer (also transformed). Q1-Q3 are usually strong but one unfamiliar word can sink an item. The matching description rarely repeats the source's exact word — it uses a synonym, so confirm every match by reading the whole sentence, not the one familiar word.
Q4/Q6 need a full transformation, not a lift
Q4 and Q6 give a first-person source but ask a third-person answer, so several forms change together: the finite verb ending (ich fühle -> sie fühlt), any possessive referring to the speaker (mein -> sein/ihr, correctly cased), and any reflexive/object pronoun (mich -> sich). Possessives for someone OTHER than the speaker stay unchanged. Missing even one — pronoun but not verb, or verb but not case — is incomplete.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
sein for a female antecedent, not ihr
When the source speaker is female, her possessive mein transforms to ihr, not sein (sein is for a male or neuter antecedent). The digest names the Marion item, where candidates used the wrong-gender sein for a female speaker. Fix: identify the person's gender from name or context first, then choose sein (he) or ihr (she); the case ending is a separate check.
Wrong-gender possessive: sein used for female Marion (w23 22 Q4).
Nominative sein Bruder for an object
A possessive on a direct-object noun needs the accusative ending. The digest names a case where seinen Bruder (accusative) was required but candidates wrote the nominative sein Bruder, losing the mark though they found who was visited. Same stem, different ending by role: sein Bruder (subject) vs seinen Bruder (object). Re-check each noun phrase for case.
Accusative seinen Bruder required, nominative sein written (s22 22 Q6(h)).
Dropping the reflexive pronoun (sich)
Reflexive verbs lose their pronoun under manipulation: the digest names Sie fühlen gesünder written for the correct sich fühlen, and the same fault a year later. The reflexive pronoun changes with the person too: ich fühle mich -> sie fühlt sich — keep sich alongside the transformed verb ending, not just the verb.
Reflexive pronoun omitted under person-shift (s22 22 Q4(a); w23 22 Q4(c)).
Leaving the tense unchanged after a shift
Under person manipulation the tense is sometimes left as the source had it — present written where the past was required, or vice versa — leaving the wrong time frame even though the correct information was located. Transform the verb's person without switching its tense: keep the source's tense unless the question signals otherwise.
Present left where past was required under manipulation (w23 22 Q4(a); s23 23 Q6(d)).
Over-lifting instead of a short answer
Longer answers that copy extra material score worse, because the extra text adds more chances of a manipulation error. The digest says, near-identically across two papers, that the most successful candidates gave short, succinct answers and did not lose marks through unsuccessful manipulation. Lift only the minimum the question needs.
Short precise answers beat over-lifted ones (s23 22/23 Q4; w23 22 Q4).
Verb left at the end of a main clause
Word order invalidates otherwise-correct Q6 answers more than anything. After rewriting, candidates leave the finite verb in the wrong place: a main clause needs the verb second (V2), but a subordinate clause after weil/dass/obwohl sends it to the end. The digest also names weil used for the subordinating dass. Re-check verb position after transforming.
Verb position wrong under manipulation; weil for dass (w22 22 Q6(i); s23 23 Q6(f); w23 22 Q6(g)).
die Familie takes a singular verb
die Familie is grammatically singular in German, though it refers to several people, so it takes a singular verb: die Familie wohnt (not wohnen). The digest names candidates giving die Familie a plural verb, which could not be credited — the German analogue of the French le personnel fault. Check collective nouns for singular agreement.
Plural verb with singular die Familie (s23 23 Q6(b)).
Thinking only the subject word changes
A common misconception is that a person-shift is one word-swap (mein -> sein), nothing else. In reality every dependent form changes together: the verb ending, the case ending on a possessive (set by the noun's role, not gender), and any reflexive/object pronoun. Fixing only the visible word leaves an answer that sounds transformed but hides a contradiction.
Manipulations must all be correct together, not partly applied (s22 21/22/23; w22 22; s23 22/23; w23 22).
Q4/Q6: locate, then check person, case, tense
For Q4/Q6: (1) locate the fact. (2) On a speaker's possessive, fix gender (sein/ihr) and case (nom/acc/dat by role). (3) Give the verb a new person ending, same tense. (4) Keep any reflexive pronoun (mich -> sich). (5) Write the shortest answer.
Match on the synonym, read the whole line
The option rarely repeats the source's exact word. Scan for a synonym, then read the whole sentence or constraint before matching. In Q5, check every requirement against every description — a match on one attribute may still fail a disqualifying detail elsewhere.
Only transform what refers to the speaker
Only forms referring to the original speaker shift. A possessive for a third party (the uncle's seine Arbeit) stays. Changing seine to ihre because the speaker is female is as wrong as under-transforming. Ask of each form: does this refer to the speaker?
Paper 2 Reading (components 21, 22 or 23) has six question groups of rising demand: picture-matching (Q1), notice-matching (Q2), three-option multiple choice (Q3), open comprehension with person/case transformation (Q4), a 5-into-8 requirement-matching exercise (Q5), and gist-and-detail short-answer comprehension, also transformed (Q6).
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.