Production vs productivity
Production is the total output of goods and services a firm or economy makes in a period. Productivity is output per factor of production per period — usually labour productivity: output divided by the number of workers. Production can rise just by using more factors, but productivity only rises when each factor produces more. Hiring more workers raises production while productivity can stay the same; training workers so each makes more raises productivity.
How to raise productivity
Labour productivity is raised by education and training (more skilled workers), better or more modern capital (machinery), the division of labour (workers specialise and get quicker), better management and motivation, and improved health. Higher productivity lowers a firm's average cost, so it can charge lower prices, earn higher profits, and compete in export markets. This is why firms and governments care so much about raising it.
Demand for a factor of production
A firm's demand for a factor of production (labour, capital, land) is a derived demand — it comes from the demand for the goods that factor helps make. The two key influences are the price (cost) of the factor and its productivity. If capital becomes cheaper or more productive relative to labour, the firm uses more capital, and vice versa. So a fall in the wage rate, or a rise in labour productivity, both raise the demand for labour.
Labour- vs capital-intensive production
Labour-intensive production uses a high proportion of labour relative to capital (hand-made pottery, hairdressing). Capital-intensive production uses a high proportion of machinery relative to labour (oil extraction, car assembly). Firms choose between them by comparing the relative cost and productivity of labour and capital. Capital-intensive methods often raise productivity and lower average cost, but raise set-up (fixed) costs and cut the number of jobs.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Mechanising: average cost down, total cost up
Moving from hand production to a mechanised process (often via the division of labour) raises output and lowers average total cost (total cost ÷ output) because each unit is made faster and more cheaply. But the firm must buy expensive machinery, so total cost rises. Do not write that both fall — only average total cost falls while total cost rises.
June 2024 Paper 1 (Multiple Choice) Q11: 34 per cent answered correctly. Candidates who chose the most popular wrong option believed total cost as well as average total cost would decrease when a firm changed from making furniture by hand to a mechanised process using the division of labour. The correct response recognised average total cost falls while total cost rises.
Demand for factors is not demand for goods
If a question asks about the influences on the demand for factors of production (labour, capital, land), do not answer with the influences on demand for goods (income, price of substitutes, fashion). The correct influences are the price/cost of the factor and its productivity, plus the demand for the final product (derived demand). Read the exact wording.
June 2024 Paper 2 (Structured) Q5(b): a number of candidates wrote about the influences on demand for goods and services rather than the influences on demand for factors of production. Those who answered the question explained the price of factors of production and their productivity, with the strongest linking relative productivity of capital and labour.
Sector does not fix factor intensity
It is wrong to assume primary-sector output is always labour-intensive and secondary-sector output always capital-intensive. Primary output can be highly capital-intensive (oil extraction, combine harvesters), and much manufacturing can be labour-intensive (hand-made pottery). The labour/capital mix is a firm-level choice, not a fixed rule of the sector.
November 2023 Paper 2 (Structured): the report noted a widespread assumption that the question was about labour-intensive products (primary) versus capital-intensive products (secondary), which it called an over-simplification — primary products can be produced by heavily capital-intensive methods and many manufacturing processes are labour-intensive.
Production is not productivity
Hiring more workers raises production (total output) but need not raise productivity (output per worker). If ten extra workers produce more chairs but each worker still makes the same number, productivity is unchanged. A question asking for one will not accept the other — check whether it wants total output or output per factor.
Manufacturing is secondary, not tertiary
Even highly mechanised, high-tech manufacturing is in the secondary sector, not the tertiary sector. Making a physical good is secondary-sector activity; the tertiary sector provides services. Do not reclassify a factory as tertiary just because it uses advanced capital — capital-intensity does not change the sector an activity belongs to.
Discuss: both sides, then judge
For an 8-mark 'discuss', develop a chain on each side, then judge. For capital-intensive: higher productivity, lower average cost. Against: high set-up cost, fewer jobs. End with a judgement tied to a stated condition, not a one-sided list.
Match the command word
Read the command word. Define = a precise meaning. Explain = give a reason or chain. Analyse = a developed cause-and-effect chain, no judgement needed. Discuss = both sides plus a supported judgement. Treating a 'discuss' like an 'explain' caps your marks.
Productivity: divide by workers
In a productivity calculation, divide total output by the number of workers to get output per worker — do not quote the rise in total output. With the number of workers unchanged, productivity rises only because each worker makes more, so always show the per-worker figures.
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.