Location weighs several competing factors
A location decision is costly and hard to reverse, so it weighs several factors: proximity to the market (customers), to labour, to raw materials/suppliers and to competitors, plus the cost of premises/land (a fixed cost) and infrastructure/transport links. There is no single best site — the right choice depends on the nature of the business, so name a factor and tie it to what THIS firm makes, sells or needs.
Nature of the business decides the factor
The nature of the business decides which factor dominates. A shop or cafe (customers travel to it) needs proximity to the market (footfall). A maker of heavy, bulky inputs (a bulk-reducing firm) needs proximity to raw materials to cut transport cost. An online retailer needs infrastructure and transport links, not footfall; a labour-intensive firm needs proximity to labour. Tie the factor to the firm in the extract.
Drawn from real examiner reports.
Generic point, not applied to the firm
The most repeated loss is failing to apply a correct point to the named firm. On a State or Outline item, a generic advantage like 'near suppliers cuts transport costs' earns the knowledge mark but not the application (AO2) mark unless tied to a specific extract detail. Naming the firm is not enough — add a scenario fact (e.g. the heavy steel frames it moves).
State/Outline items lose the AO2 mark without an extract detail — Nov 2024 P1 Q2(a)/Q2(b); Nov 2024 P2 Q1(d) (80% scored zero).
Market ≠ raw materials
Two different factors that often pull in opposite directions. Proximity to the market = near the customers who buy the product; proximity to raw materials = near the inputs used to make it. A fresh-bread bakery locates near customers; a steel-frame maker near its heavy supplier. Writing 'near the market so raw materials are cheaper' muddles the two.
Rent is a fixed cost, not variable
Rent or the price of premises/land is a fixed cost — paid whatever the business produces or sells — not a variable cost. A high-rent site raises fixed costs, so the firm must be sure the location brings in enough extra revenue (e.g. footfall) to cover it. Mislabelling it as variable also breaks break-even and profit reasoning.
No single factor suits every firm
No factor is decisive for every business — the best site depends on the nature of the firm: does it need customers (market), workers (labour), inputs (raw materials) or despatch links (infrastructure)? Assuming footfall always matters loses marks when the firm is an online retailer or a no-visitor factory. Decide first what THIS business most needs.
Bulky finished goods pull to the market
Proximity to raw materials is not automatic. A firm whose FINISHED product is bulky, fragile or perishable may instead locate near the market, to cut the cost or risk of moving finished goods. A bulk-reducing firm (heavy inputs, lighter output) sits near raw materials; one with bulky output sits near the market. Which is costlier to move — inputs or output?
Cheapest location is automatically best
A common misconception is picking the cheapest premises, treating location as cost-cutting alone. The best site balances cost against revenue. A cheap out-of-town unit saves rent but for a shop can slash footfall and sales, so profit falls despite lower costs. Conversely, a costly high-footfall site is wasted on an online firm. Location is a judgement, not arithmetic.
Nov 2024 P1 & P2 summaries: weaker extended answers treat a location decision one-sidedly (cost only) and miss the AO4 trade-off.
Match the command word
Give exactly what the command word wants. Define/State = the term. Outline = identify AND develop it. Analyse = a cause-and-effect chain. Justify/Evaluate = a supported judgement. Writing all you know instead of answering the exact question wastes marks.
Analyse builds a chain, not a verdict
Keep analyse and evaluate apart. An Analyse wants a chain — factor -> effect -> consequence — with no judgement. An Evaluate or Justify wants that chain PLUS a supported decision. A verdict on an Analyse adds nothing; leaving one off an Evaluate caps you mid-band.
AO4 needs a supported judgement
On the 9-mark Justify and 12-mark Evaluate, AO4 is a supported choice tied to the nature of THIS firm — why one site outweighs the other, not a two-sided list. End with a conditional decision that names the winning site.
Choosing where to locate is a major decision because it is expensive and hard to reverse. The wrong site can cost a business customers, raise its costs, or both. There is no single best location — the right choice depends on the nature of the business.
| Factor | What it means | Matters most to |
|---|---|---|
| Proximity to the market | being near the customers who buy the product | shops, cafes, services customers visit; firms with bulky/perishable finished goods |
Full notes, flashcards, Q&A and the topic quiz for every premium subject.
Premium plans are US$8.99/month or US$49.99/year — first month free.
Studying with a parent's blessing? Show them this.